Who?
Harold Bell Wright (1872-1944) was born in Rome, New York. After being orphaned at the age of ten, he worked on a farm, and later took up house painting and other odd jobs to survive. Despite never being taught in a seminary or religious institution, Wright became a preacher. He rarely spent more than a couple years with any one congregation, moving back and forth between Kansas, Missouri, and California. He was a preaching in Pittsburg, Kansas when he wrote his first novel, That Printer of Udell’s. The novel only saw publication due to a chance meeting between Wright and a man named Elsbery W. Reynolds. Reynolds, a mail-order bookseller, met Wright at a religious revival event in Chicago. Reynolds published That Printer of Udell’s to moderate success. Likewise, he printed Wright’s second novel, The Shepherd of the Hills, with a fair degree of success. After the publication of his second novel, Wright retired from preaching and, with Reynolds help, became one of the most successful novelists America had ever seen.
So what's this book about?
The Eyes of the World is the story of a young painter named Aaron King, who heads out west to California. There, he meets and befriends Conrad Lagrange, a famous and critically renowned novelist who, by his own admission, writes “the putrid offal that self-respecting writers reject.” The plot revolves around whether Aaron will flatter the rich and powerful men and women who control the art world, or keep his integrity as an artist. Meanwhile, he falls in love with a free-spirited girl named Sybil.
The Eyes of the World is the story of a young painter named Aaron King, who heads out west to California. There, he meets and befriends Conrad Lagrange, a famous and critically renowned novelist who, by his own admission, writes “the putrid offal that self-respecting writers reject.” The plot revolves around whether Aaron will flatter the rich and powerful men and women who control the art world, or keep his integrity as an artist. Meanwhile, he falls in love with a free-spirited girl named Sybil.
The story
is a feel-good morality tale. Nothing
surprising or original is attempted, let alone accomplished. While simple, morally uplifting stories
always have their place, The Eyes of the
World is a mess. For one thing, it
frequently loses focus, giving the reader thirty page descriptions of the San
Bernardino mountains apropos of nothing.
From the beginning of the story we can guess where the characters are
going to end up. Yet they still take a
long time to get there.
More
problematic than the lack of cohesion is the general weirdness of the
characters. To put it simply, they do
not act like human beings. Then again,
perhaps they weren’t meant to. Each
character represents some aspect of society.
Lagrange explains this early on in the novel, telling Aaron that he
would like to write a novel in which all the people around him are named for
what they represent. Thus Aaron King is
Art, Lagrange is Civilization, Sybil is Nature.
The cast features others, including Lust, Materialism, The Age, and
Symbol. According to Frank Mott’s
history of bestsellers, “Up to the last
typing of The Eyes of the World, no
character had been given any name except that of his or her chief quality.” Every action a character makes seems to be
based solely on how well it represents what the character represents. Hence, Sybil/Nature is unpredictable,
constantly running around and singing.
Does telling someone to avert their eyes so you can secretly weave them a basket
sound like something a normal person would do?
Of course not, but Sybil isn’t a normal person. Today, we’d call her a manic pixie dream
girl.
♪ Missster F! ♪ |
Why was it so popular?
Morally simplistic stories with mediocre writing have always had a space in the public’s interest. But The Eyes of the World was a huge financial success. Of the thirteen books of the 1910’s to sell a number of copies equal to at least one percent of the U.S. population, three were by Wright, putting him in the company of classics like Tarzan of the Apes (Burroughs), Penrod (Tarkington), and The Riders of the Purple Sage (Grey). How did he manage this?
Morally simplistic stories with mediocre writing have always had a space in the public’s interest. But The Eyes of the World was a huge financial success. Of the thirteen books of the 1910’s to sell a number of copies equal to at least one percent of the U.S. population, three were by Wright, putting him in the company of classics like Tarzan of the Apes (Burroughs), Penrod (Tarkington), and The Riders of the Purple Sage (Grey). How did he manage this?
Harold
Wright and Elsbery Reynolds were great at one thing: advertising. After the moderate success of his first two
novels, Wright's third book, The Calling of
Dan Matthews, was given an advertising budget of $48,000. Approximately $1,200,000 in today’s
currency. Mott writes, "Though strong
book advertising had been fairly common for several years, these figure were
nothing less than revolutionary. Full-page advertisements in the newspapers not only announced the new book but also promoted his its two predecessors." The Eyes of the World received an
advertising budget of $100,000, approximately $2,250,000 in today’s
currency.
Critics were also talking about Wright's books. Since the publication of The Calling of Dan Matthews in 1909, rarely did a critic say anything nicer than a backhanded compliment. From The Bookman's review of Dan Matthews:
It is precisely the sort of book which the readers who like this author's previous volumes may reasonably be expected to enjoy. That it has no special structural merit, no special distinction of style is quite beside the point.
In its review of The Winning of Barbara Worth (1911), the New York Times wrote:
Mr. Wright had a big theme before him, but he has handled it in a commonplace, amateurish way. The story, however, is better in construction, more closely and smoothly knit together than his previous novels.
Publishers Weekly wrote of The Eyes of the World:
The story has the elements which make for popularity.
Critics were also talking about Wright's books. Since the publication of The Calling of Dan Matthews in 1909, rarely did a critic say anything nicer than a backhanded compliment. From The Bookman's review of Dan Matthews:
It is precisely the sort of book which the readers who like this author's previous volumes may reasonably be expected to enjoy. That it has no special structural merit, no special distinction of style is quite beside the point.
In its review of The Winning of Barbara Worth (1911), the New York Times wrote:
Mr. Wright had a big theme before him, but he has handled it in a commonplace, amateurish way. The story, however, is better in construction, more closely and smoothly knit together than his previous novels.
Publishers Weekly wrote of The Eyes of the World:
The story has the elements which make for popularity.
Why haven't I heard of it?
After World War One, Wright’s book sales dropped and Elsbery Reynolds dissolved their partnership. He turned his attention to other endeavors, but kept writing, publishing nine novels and an autobiography between 1921 and 1942. Two of his novels were turned into successful movies: The Winning of Barbara Worth starring Gary Cooper in 1926, and The Shepherd of the Hills starring John Wayne in 1941. Neither have remained notably popular.
Should I read it?
After World War One, Wright’s book sales dropped and Elsbery Reynolds dissolved their partnership. He turned his attention to other endeavors, but kept writing, publishing nine novels and an autobiography between 1921 and 1942. Two of his novels were turned into successful movies: The Winning of Barbara Worth starring Gary Cooper in 1926, and The Shepherd of the Hills starring John Wayne in 1941. Neither have remained notably popular.
Should I read it?
I wouldn’t
recommend it. Simply put, it’s not very
good.
Also published in 1914:
Dubliners by James Joyce
Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs
You can read The Eyes of the World on Project Gutenberg.
Sources:
Mott, Frank Luther. Golden Multitudes: The Story of Best Sellers in the United States. New York: The Macmillan Company. 1947.
Fanning, Clara and Wilson, Justina. The Book Review Digest. Minneapolis: The H. W. Wilson Company. 1909.
Fanning, Clara and Wilson, Justina. The Book Review Digest. Minneapolis: The H. W. Wilson Company. 1911.
Fanning, Clara and Reely, Mary. The Book Review Digest. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company. 1915.
The westegg.com inflation calculator
Harold Bell Wright sales information
Also published in 1914:
Dubliners by James Joyce
Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs
You can read The Eyes of the World on Project Gutenberg.
Sources:
Mott, Frank Luther. Golden Multitudes: The Story of Best Sellers in the United States. New York: The Macmillan Company. 1947.
Fanning, Clara and Wilson, Justina. The Book Review Digest. Minneapolis: The H. W. Wilson Company. 1909.
Fanning, Clara and Wilson, Justina. The Book Review Digest. Minneapolis: The H. W. Wilson Company. 1911.
Fanning, Clara and Reely, Mary. The Book Review Digest. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company. 1915.
The westegg.com inflation calculator
Harold Bell Wright sales information
Anyone with a good sense of morals and a love of nature will enjoy this clean, adventurous love story. Its moral message is timeless and speaks out against the hypocrisy of the world. The negative review given to this book speaks of a lack of integrity of the reviewer. It is possible that one or more of the character types have condemned the reviewer. This book is a masterpiece if one reads it with an open mind.
ReplyDeleteAnyone with a good sense of morals and a love of nature will enjoy this clean, adventurous love story. Its moral message is timeless and speaks out against the hypocrisy of the world. The negative review given to this book speaks of a lack of integrity of the reviewer. It is possible that one or more of the character types have condemned the reviewer. This book is a masterpiece if one reads it with an open mind.
ReplyDelete