Who?
Newton Booth Tarkington (1869-1946) was born, lived, and set most of his works in Indiana. He was the offspring of old American families: His father’s side of the family moved to Indiana from the south in the late eighteenth century, and his mother’s family in New England could be traced back to colonial days and still held prominent positions in society and politics (in fact, Booth was named after his uncle, Newton Booth, then governor of California). During his youth, his family was one of many who fell into financial hardship. They managed to hold on, and Tarkington was educated at Purdue and later Princeton University. He became a rather successful playwright and novelist, his first novel, The Gentlemen from Indiana, being published in 1899. But it was not until a divorce and his marriage to Susanah Robinson in 1912 that he entered what biographer James Woodress called his “major phase.” The first novel of this phase was 1915’s The Turmoil, the first volume of what became known as Tarkington’s Growth trilogy, including his Pulitzer-prize winning novel, The Magnificent Ambersons (1918). Tarkington was the first author to win two Pulitzer prizes for fiction (the second was for 1921’s Alice Adams), a feat that has only been duplicated by John Updike and William Faulkner.
So what's this book about?
The Turmoil tells the story of the nouveau riche Sheridan family, led by the consummate industrialist, Jim Sheridan. The main character is the family’s youngest son, twenty-two year old Bibbs Sheridan, who at the beginning of the novel is returning from a sanitarium after two years spent recovering from a nervous breakdown brought on by his father’s attempt to mold Bibbs after his own image (as he had successfully done with Bibbs’ two older brothers). The novel’s main focus is on the relationship between Jim and his children and the relationship between the Sheridan’s and the “old rich” families of Indianapolis, specifically the secretly destitute Vertreeses and their daughter Mary, and how these things affect Bibbs’ personal growth.
The Turmoil tells the story of the nouveau riche Sheridan family, led by the consummate industrialist, Jim Sheridan. The main character is the family’s youngest son, twenty-two year old Bibbs Sheridan, who at the beginning of the novel is returning from a sanitarium after two years spent recovering from a nervous breakdown brought on by his father’s attempt to mold Bibbs after his own image (as he had successfully done with Bibbs’ two older brothers). The novel’s main focus is on the relationship between Jim and his children and the relationship between the Sheridan’s and the “old rich” families of Indianapolis, specifically the secretly destitute Vertreeses and their daughter Mary, and how these things affect Bibbs’ personal growth.
Therein
lies the heart of the novel: Bibbs, the dreamer, poet, and outsider, assuming
his maturity in a changing world.
Tarkington creates an honest picture of an isolated young man with vague
ambition and his transformation as he reenters the world and falls for Mary
Vertrees. The story is often funny and,
on a few occasions, tragic, as the lives of all the characters drastically
change.
Besides
Bibbs and Mary Vertrees, the characters are often typecast so as to parody
certain kinds of people or situations.
That is not to say that they don’t have depth (although there are a few
characters who don’t), and this parody is intended and generally succeeds in
being humorous. And when the characters
examine the reasons behind their behavior, or break from their established
caricatures, it is done skillfully, giving the reader a deeper understanding
of their personalities.
Overall, The Turmoil has aged well. The relationships between the members of the
Sheridan family are true to life and easily accessible, even after all this
time. However, the attitudes the
characters hold in regard to romantic relationships and the old wealth vs. new
wealth are strictly representative of their time.
So why was it so popular?
So why was it so popular?
This was a
time of great industrialization and corporate growth in the United States. The lives of the rich and powerful have
always been popular subjects for novels, and the fall of American “aristocracy”
to the nouveau riche was of particular prevalence at that time. I also noticed an interesting correlation
between The Turmoil and The Inside of the Cup: they have remarkably similar
openings. Both describe a midwestern
city, once home to the well-to-do, now made urban and industrial. In both openings, the sign and symbol of this
prosperity, is smoke. Churchill wrote:
“Little did the … prominent people foresee the havoc that prosperity and smoke
were to play with their residential plans! One by one, sooty commerce drove
them out.” Tarkington wrote: “The smoke
is like the bad breath of a giant panting for more and more riches. He gets them and pants the fiercer, smelling
and swelling prodigiously. He has a
voice, a hoarse voice, hot and rapacious
trained to one tune: ‘Wealth! I will get Wealth!’”
The
industrialization of the Midwest affected many people, including
Tarkington. According to his biography:
“The sedate, well-mannered, and self-contained society that he rememberd in
Indianapolis in 1900 had crumbled before the irresistible force of big business
and the vast complexities of an industrial democracy. The life he formerly knew had been succeeded
by a frenetic rat race in the grimy maze of his once relaxed and friendly city
(Woodress 181-2).
Why haven't I heard of it?
That’s a good
question. At the time of writing this,
I’ve already finished reading Tarkington’s Seventeen
(the bestseller of 1916). Judging from
these two (very different) novels, I feel that the reason is that they are very
much period pieces. Obviously, much
fiction takes place at the time it was written, and that time is from a past period, but that is not what I mean by
“period piece.” As I define it, a period
piece is a story in which the attitudes of the characters are deeply entrenched
in that specific time and place. For
example, if we look at Joseph Conrad’s Heart
of Darkness and the film adaptation Apocalypse
Now, even with the change in the specifics of the setting (replace
colonized Congo with occupied Vietnam, mercantile with military), the
characters’ attitudes and values are not anachronistic. The same cannot be said of Tarkington’s
characters. The characters are still
accessible and coherent, but they can only be understood as products of their
time.
Should I read it?
If you don’t
mind period pieces, then yes. The Turmoil is fun, emotional, and
well-written.
You can read The Turmoil on Project Gutenberg.
Also published in 1915:
The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka
Of Human Bondage by W. Somerset Maugham
Sources:
Churchill, Winston. The Inside of the Cup. 1913.
Tarkington, Booth. The Turmoil. 1915.
Woodress, James. Booth Tarkington: Gentleman from Indiana. New York: J. B. Lippincott. 1955.
You can read The Turmoil on Project Gutenberg.
Also published in 1915:
The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka
Of Human Bondage by W. Somerset Maugham
Sources:
Churchill, Winston. The Inside of the Cup. 1913.
Tarkington, Booth. The Turmoil. 1915.
Woodress, James. Booth Tarkington: Gentleman from Indiana. New York: J. B. Lippincott. 1955.
Like the concept of your blog, Matt. Of course the literary quality of the works you will be reading is all over the map, from very high (Steinbeck) to fairly dismal (the seventies has some clunkers). But I like the idea of putting works in their historical context, and perhaps touting works that deserve a look that have been forgotten. I envy you the time to read and respond and wish you luck.
ReplyDeleteHi Matt, I finished reading "The Turmoil". I took your suggestion and skipped "The Eyes of the World". I though "The Turmoil" was pretty good. I could see it as a 1930's movie with maybe Fred Astair as Bibbs. This and "The Inside of the Cup" were both set in some unnamed mid-western city. The common theme was the air pollution. It was sort of a back ground nuisance in "Cup" but it was practically a main character in "Turmoil".
ReplyDelete